News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Consumers misled about ethanol's fuel economy: ALFA 

Consumers misled about ethanol's fuel economy: ALFA

14 Jul, 2008 05:25 PM
The Australian Lot Feeders' Association has complained to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission that consumers are being misled at the bowser about ethanol's fuel economy rates compared to conventional petrol.

ALFA has requested the ACCC take action over the point of sale material, claiming ethanol's fuel efficiency is actually inferior to petrol.

"Consumers are currently being misled by a lack of point of purchase information, along with ethanol prices, which do not reflect its lower energy and hence inferior fuel economy rates compared to conventional petrol," ALFA vice president Jim Cudmore said.

"This we believe arguably breaches the misleading and deceptive conduct provisions of the Trade Practices Act.

"CSIRO research has demonstrated that ethanol has 34pc less energy than conventional petrol and therefore more ethanol is required to drive the same number of kilometres.

"If motorists are to be compensated for this poorer fuel consumption then it is estimated that a 10pc ethanol to fuel blend (ie E10) would need to be priced at 2-3pc(around 4 cents/ litre) less than conventional petrol.

"However, E10 blended fuel is almost never priced less at this discount as evidenced by NRMA's petrol watch scheme."

ALFA has been a vocal opponent of government support for the ethanol industry, claiming ethanol production takes grain away from the feedlot sector, with the added demand also contributing to higher grain and food prices.

It says the ethanol industry receives around $95 million a year in State and Federal Government assistance, including the provision of up to $20,000 for each service station to provide the product and discount it to consumers.

"Given this preferential Government assistance over conventional fuel production, ALFA believes that there is no reason why consumers cannot be informed about the inferior fuel economy of ethanol and have the product priced accordingly in the market place," Mr Cudmore said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Remember Johnny Howard's mate down at Manildra? Just loving it!
Posted by miasma, 15/07/2008 9:06:46 AM
This article is misleading and should be retracted. I base this on the following reasons: Ethanol enhances petrol giving it a cleaner more efficent burn there by reducing its lower energy impact. Ethanol is also an octane enhancer. Ethanol blended petrol E10 should be compared in price to premium unleaded petrol. In Qld most outlets do sell E10 at a discount to normal unleaded petrol.

The figure of $95m in support is also wrong. This amount included feasibility money for potential projects which was never spent and the federal government retained the money.

The comment in the last paragraph is also very misleading. ALFA have not done their homework on this. The federal government assists the oil and fuel companies to something like $9 billion per year. So who is getting preferential assistance, certainly not the ethanol industry.

Posted by DDP, 15/07/2008 10:19:32 AM
I haven't seen the CSIRO study but I changed to E10 a bit over a year ago -- the price is ALWAYS 2-3 cents cheaper and I get exactly the same full consumption (I drive Prius mostly in Sydney and I get 4.8-4.9 l/100km, this year just like last year). E10 seems a very good deal to me.
Posted by Andrew23, 15/07/2008 10:39:30 AM
The claims by AFLA on ethanol are misleading and fail to take account of the broader economic, social and environmental benefits of ethanol. Firstly, ethanol is a cleaner fuel and this will reduce the pollution in cities that accounts for significant health problems, costing the economy much more than any investment by governments into ethanol. Secondly, ethanol production only uses the carbohydrates in the grain and the left-over distillers grain is high in protein and other nutrients.

This resource can be used for a high protein human food, stock feed, soil conditioners, etc. There will be no appreciable loss of food (nutrients) from consumers (including AFLA) and there is an added bonus in that farmers will receive nutrients back in the form of biologically active soil conditioner and liquid fertiliser.

In this respect, ethanol production is a highly sustainable enterprise compared with feedlots where cattle are forced to eat grains that elevates the Omega 6 levels by 3 fold in meat and this is not good for human health.

Posted by Mangiri, 15/07/2008 10:44:37 AM
Let me ask one basic question - why is a feedlot a more important use than ethanol production ? If we don't develop alternative fuels then your cattle might not only be underfed - they will also be undelivered.
Posted by bigdog, 15/07/2008 11:04:35 AM
I am concerned that the ALFA is claiming ethanol's fuel efficiency is actually inferior to petrol. Whilst the energy componant may be less, the health benefits of a clean burning fuel which reduces tailpipe emissions is priceless. These harmful chemicals cause a huge burden on our health system and peoples lives. The CO2 being released from fossil fuels is effecting our greenhouse. How does the saving of 3-4 cents become more important than peoples health and our environment.
Posted by ethanol is good, 15/07/2008 12:17:57 PM
Personally, I have not noticed any difference in fuel economy from using E10 compared to unleaded. Ethanol has a lower fuel density but burns more efficiently than gasoline.

High compressions engines optimised to a set % of ethanol will get better fuel economy than flex fuel cars.

Similarly, high compression diesel engines get over 30% better fuel economy than gasoline equivalent engines, even though diesel has only 12.5% higher energy density than gasoline.

I was recently on vacation in the UK and drove a 1.9l Saab diesel turbo. Fuel economy highway/town was 43mpg+. 53mpg on the motorway with 5 people and luggage.

Posted by Terry, 15/07/2008 3:42:32 PM
My heart consultant and coronary literature tells me to avoid overfat finished meat products like those that come from cattle feedlots, inefficient use of grain to make unhealthy food!
Posted by Heart tick, 15/07/2008 11:37:55 PM
the impact of 10% ethanol in fuel might result in "cleaner tailpipe emissions" but the effect on greenhouse gas emmissions is minimal. If we want to improve the environment we need to use less fuel (of any kind) across the board, in industry and heavy transport not just passenger cars. In terms of ethanol we need to look at the whole picture. How much energy is required to produce ethanol? The net gains are estimated somewhere between -5% and +5%. In other words, for every 100 litres of ethanol the equivalent of somewhere between 95 and 105 litres of fuel was used to produce it. Its not even a bandaid solution. those of you who think ethanol is sustainable perhaps should have a rethink. As we debate, another few hundred hectares of Brazilian rain forest has been removed in the name of ethanol.
Posted by pigboy, 16/07/2008 5:25:36 PM
Ethanol fuel also rusts out exhaust systems due to the lower burning power/temperatures.

For E10 use in aircraft and boats it is dangerous as will a tank full of fuel you do not have the same range as with straight petrol.

This is something that the Greens do not mention!

Posted by Mt Sinai, 17/07/2008 5:30:04 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you believe the creation of an emissions trading system poses a threat or opportunity for your farm business?

Threat
(59.6%)

Opportunity
(17.7%)

Unsure - more information needed
(22.7%)

Total Votes: 480
Poll Date: 13 July, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...