News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Coalition deliberately "clouds" property rights inquiry 

Coalition deliberately "clouds" property rights inquiry

12 Feb, 2010 10:11 AM
OPPOSITION Senators have blocked crucial elements in a new property rights inquiry, throwing out a clause to investigate claims the Howard Government forced State governments to ban land clearing.

While a proposed inquiry into property rights was supported and successful, amendments to look specifically at whether an Inter-Governmental agreement was the trigger for land clearing legislation introduced by the States so the Federal Government could meet its Kyoto commitments were not.

Despite previous admissions by both the former Prime Minister, John Howard, and Treasurer, Peter Costello, that there was Federal Government involvement in the bans on land clearing, that link and the subsequent impact it may have had on farmers and their property rights will not form part of the property rights inquiry.

Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, told Rural Press that blocking that part of the issue "puts a cloud" over the entire inquiry.

"The whole idea of an inquiry is to say 'let's find out what happened?" Mr Burke told Rural Press this week.

"I don't think you start consideration of an inquiry with an agenda.

"You open an inquiry on the basis that you want to find out exactly what happened.

"Now when farmers make allegations about their concerns about what happened with land clearing laws they refer to what happened in the States, what happened with a COAG agreement and what happened surrounding Kyoto.

"My view was let's investigate all the concerns that farmers raised."

Mr Burke said instead the approach from the Coalition was to say "we'll investigate all the bits except the bits we might be responsible for".

This is despite Mr Burke admitting he has his own concerns about the arguments put by farmers in relation to the Federal-State link.

"Some of the timelines don't quite match, but the fact that you disagree with something or you're not convinced of something doesn't mean you shut down all the inquiries.

"They had a chance for it to be an inquiry which investigated everything. They turned it into an inquiry that investigated everything except their record.

"I think it also shows how quickly Tony Abbott and Barnaby (Joyce) will go from saying one thing to farmers and another thing the moment they're inside the parliament.

"It took two days for Tony Abbott to move from being "at your side" to being in cover up.

"I think that goes to the heart of how sincere he was when he addressed the farmers."

Nationals Senate leader, Barnaby Joyce, said there is still scope for those Kyoto concerns of farmers to be addressed, although he doubts how helpful it will be.

Senator Joyce told Rural Press emphatically that land clearing laws were State imposed, and States chose not to compensate farmers for the impacts from those laws.

He said while it may be wonderful to some to have a historical debate, it would not fix future property rights problems.

Details of the inquiry, which will hear evidence throughout country Australia, will be advertised this week.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Coalition deliberately "clouds" property rights inquiry 12/2/10: Myself & others were concerned that all property owners & farmers were dudded...a Senate inquiry is not a Royal Commission that was wanted. Also, private property & all that covers is already in print but political parties (& this appears to be all according to above item) do not want people to know about their inherited laws. Why is this so? Is it so? As I had written before, Senate Inquiries can go on & on & on...results, nil or ignored. Remember the 'Pied Pipers' we had hoped we could trust & a sincere turn-a-around had happened. Now, I sense no. P.Parties & groups are still talking 'climate change' as though it is fact instead of the PPs who spoke against ETS, saying: We delete 'climate change' completely, clean up any pollution, improve actions/living but say no to the 'climate change' UN control ! Jillian Spring Billinudgel
Posted by Jillian Spring, 12/02/2010 2:27:58 PM
The opposition Senators have something to hide obviously. Rudd won't change it either so it seems to me that we should all be voting for someone other than the major parties.
Posted by evenhand, 12/02/2010 2:47:12 PM
Obviously they know the answer. They forced the States to introduce the legislation. What fools do they take us for? We need a new 'keep the bastards honest' party, or an alignment of independents, to hold the balance of power.
Posted by daw, 12/02/2010 4:23:09 PM
The Howard Government encouraged state governments to implement land clearing, but the state governments were the ones who decided what type of legislation it would be, and no one but the state governments decided not to pay compensation, even though the federal government gave them money to do so. The theft of property rights lies squarely at the feet of state governments.
Posted by Concerned Northerner, 12/02/2010 4:29:57 PM
Concerned Northerner is absolutely correct but there is still an elephant in the room: the federal Nationals, and their acquiesence in the whole deal.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 12/02/2010 7:27:06 PM
Hope they are all wearing clean undies.
Posted by Tonytwotimbers, 12/02/2010 7:28:46 PM
Don't allow this to stand. Howard did more damage to rural Australia than Hawke, and he must be called to account for it.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 13/02/2010 1:03:28 PM
Again the hard-working taxpaying Australian is ignored in the dismissal of holding a Royal Commission into the erosion of "Property Rights". These rights are the corner stone of every democracy and are now being adopted by most countries where they had been non-existant. A land owner now has no rights in Australia with no provision for fair and just compensation when their land is taken by government. A dictatorial act of thuggery.
Posted by Ralph Prestage, 13/02/2010 5:37:29 PM
Concerned Northerner - I assume you just lost your train of thought when you typed 'The Howard Government encouraged state governments to implement land clearing,...' because what Howard did was encouraged the states to implement anti-clearing laws and by so doing was able to cry 'it is a state matter'. In criminal law the term is 'aiding and abetting'. Howard you stand condemned.
Posted by daw, 14/02/2010 9:56:20 AM
One of the biggest problems in this country is the 'organised political parties' - whilst politicians toe the party line they follow the donation dollars and ignore the people. Look for the "independents" when voting!
Posted by Ann, 14/02/2010 9:51:39 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
11 February, 2010
POLL
Q: One year on from the Black Saturday bushfires, do you think governments are now conducting adequate preventative backburning?

Yes
(5.3%)

No
(89%)

Undecided
(5.7%)

Total Votes: 563
Poll Date: 07 February, 2010

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...