News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Climate snapshot reveals we're heating up 

Climate snapshot reveals we're heating up

15 Mar, 2010 07:09 AM
THE nation's two leading scientific agencies will release a report today showing Australia has warmed up significantly over the past 50 years. It is a response to recent attacks on the science underpinning climate change.

The ''State of the Climate'' snapshot, drawn together by the CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology, shows the mean temperature has increased 0.7 degrees since 1960.

The snapshot also finds average daily maximum temperatures have increased every decade for the past 50 years.

The report states temperature observations, among other indicators, ''clearly demonstrate climate change is real''.

''CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology will continue to provide observations and research so Australia's responses are underpinned by clear empirical data,'' the report says.

Other findings reveal the past decade was the nation's warmest on record, sea levels rose between 1.5 millimetre and 3 millimetres a year in the south and east and between 7 millimetres and 10 millimetres in the north between 1993 and 2009, and sea surface temperatures have risen 0.4 degrees since 1960.

The release of the report comes as many Australian scientists expressed concern over attacks on the science underpinning man-made global warming, fearing it is damaging the reputation of science as a whole.

The former Australian of the Year and long-time climate campaigner Tim Flannery last month urged climate scientist to talk to the ''confused Australian public'' and answer their questions about the science.

The director of the Bureau of Meteorology, Greg Ayres, told the Herald the purpose of the climate snapshot was to remind the public that the bureau had been collecting objective and observable climate information for a century.

''I would like to invite the Australian public to use … the information generated in the national interest to reach an opinion on climate change because it is objective information,'' Dr Ayers said.

He said the trends in temperatures back up the findings of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change showing human processes, such as burning fossil fuels, was the primary cause of global warming.

The panel's findings have been criticised recently because of errors found in its landmark fourth assessment report, including an unsubstantiated claim the Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035.

The UN has invited the InterAcademy Panel on International Issues to conduct an independent review of the work of the intergovernmental panel, which will report in August.

The CSIRO's chief executive, Megan Clark, said yesterday that while society would have a debate about the science underpinning climate change - much like previous debates about the link between smoking and lung cancer - the CSIRO's role was to release ''unemotional'' scientific data.

The release of the report comes as the federal government prepares to refocus its message on climate change after its failure to pass its emissions trading scheme in Parliament last year.

The government is now expected to focus on the social and environmental consequences of unmitigated climate change.

The Minister for Climate Change, Senator Penny Wong, is also understood to have held meetings with Australian climate scientists to hone the government's message on climate science before the election.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Heating up again! I thought we were cooling down? trex
Posted by trex, 15/03/2010 10:06:09 AM
Get over it guys, you lost the scientific argument 10 years ago. So you change to politics now you are losing the political argument as well.
Posted by Qlander, 15/03/2010 10:24:20 AM
10 scientists will pop up and say were cooling but theyll be shot down or silenced before any research gets out
Posted by shaun, 15/03/2010 11:01:58 AM
The Australian public is not confused, Tim Flannery. The dissenters are illogical, illiterate or at best, semi-literate, intellectually-challenged, in denial and ill-served (by self-serving agenda-driven denialists, redraggers and ratbags a la Christopher Monckton, Alan Jones et al). They are frightened, inward-thinking people who do not want to be forced to face reality, especially if it requires change, the anathema to such people. All they have to do is open their mind, read what is freely available and think; admittedly all three prerequisites are probably beyond the capabilities of many. Above all else, they have to start with a clear ambition to be objective, and this is clearly demonstrated to be beyond the capabilities of many posters to FOL on articles related to climate change, if past posts are any indication.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 15/03/2010 11:55:30 AM
This is what $270 million at BOM and hundreds of millions more at the CSIRO gets us - climate propaganda. So this is regional warming then but the globe is cooling. Sounds all perfectly natural to me and no need for climate communism!
Posted by alph, 15/03/2010 12:16:38 PM
Bushie Bill, your verbal diarrhea is not worth commenting on. You must get out of bed, stand in front of a mirror, and hate what you see.
Posted by jerangle, 15/03/2010 12:44:22 PM
Believe it, don't believe, it doesn't make any difference. The fact is that the climate is changing, and that we have the power to influence the rate at which that change occurs, and what our response should be. I would love to be able to say "ignore it at your own peril" but here's the crux: If you deny or ignore the existence of climate change and take no action and you're right, we're no worse off. But if you deny the existence of climate change and it proves to be a legimate threat to the planet (and our selfish, consumerist lifestyles) then you are contributing towards hastening the end. You have to believe someone; Science is a safer bet than ignorance.
Posted by Pickle, 15/03/2010 12:57:20 PM
The science is settled Qlander. It was explored and questioned back in the 80's and 90's. Just accept that the majority of scientists and all publicly funded met services from around the world know that AGW is happening. 1950's farm think cant keep going in a AGW world...simple as that.... Is this the reason for a lot of rural Australia's "late" denial on this issue.
Posted by Pete - Upper Murray, 15/03/2010 12:57:30 PM
jerangle, would that be "diarrhoea" you are talking about? I googled it (diarrhoea, that is) and the first website I found said it "may be caused by a number of things such as diet, drugs, inflammatory bowel disorder, or infection". Well, jerangle, I am pleased to say I do not suffer from any of these afflictions, so I can assure you diarrhoea is not my problem, not even the verbal kind to which you refer. Now perhaps we can turn to your problem: could it possibly be the dreaded Meum Cerebrum Nocet Syndrome? It certainly does not seem you are experiencing the Mihi Cura Futuri phenomenon that is apparently so rare in RARA.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 15/03/2010 4:28:58 PM
No one is denying the climate is changing, its been changing since the beginning of time and will continue to change. What is the subject at hand here is man made co2 emissions or co2 emissions of any type responsible at all for that change. And history and science show it is not responsible . If you want to see the main driver of climate change then walk outside and look up into the sky at that big ball of fire called the SUN. All other influences are small and it is sheer folly to sugest man is responsible and that a huge tax and sending us back to the stoneage will change the climate. Huge money and political power is what is at play here and comments from know it all nasty people like bushie bill just confirm my belief that we are dealing with a dangerous green religion here that needs to be confronted.
Posted by Loc Hey, 15/03/2010 5:53:11 PM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 March, 2010
11 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you support the move to introduce an import risk analysis on beef from BSE-affected countries?

Yes
(74.6%)

No
(22.4%)

Uncommitted
(3.1%)

Total Votes: 389
Poll Date: 15 March, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...