News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Carbon tax to hit dairy farmers the hardest 

Carbon tax to hit dairy farmers the hardest

21 Dec, 2011 07:41 AM
DAIRY farmers will be slugged hard by the carbon tax in the short term, with many expected to pay more than $4000 a year in lost revenue and higher electricity costs for the next few years, a government report has found.

The report released yesterday by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences found that among all agricultural sectors, dairy would be hardest hit because of its high electricity use.

While farmers will not pay a carbon price per se, they are likely to be hit by higher electricity prices and freight costs, and lower prices for their produce as big food processors - who make up the bulk of meat and dairy farmers' sales - pass on their own carbon price costs.

The National Farmers Federation chief, Matt Linnegar, said that the carbon tax slug was one among many issues facing farmers. ''When we're talking about up to 5 per cent [in losses] for some people … and when you add the high Aussie dollar and a number of other factors, it might be one more thing that tips people over,'' he said.

The value of dairy farm production would drop by up to 4.3 per cent, or $4200, in 2012-13 and by up to 4.7 per cent, or $4580, in 2014-15, the report found.

Beef farmers would lose up to 1.8 per cent, or $1100, in economic value in 2012-2013, the report found. This would rise to as much as 2.5 per cent, or $1540, in 2014-15 once heavy road transport is brought into the carbon price scheme, pushing up the cost of freight.

The Treasury's previously published modelling suggested that farmers may be better off in the long run under the carbon price. A spokesman for the Climate Change Minister, Greg Combet, said the government had excluded agriculture from the carbon price ''in recognition of its role in the economy and environment''.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
And Conroy's off in a corner somewhere bawling his eyes out & blubbering on Combet's shoulder in typical labor style sympathy, I suppose. They happily gouge farmers & workers & pensioners & then laugh & pocket their own pay rise. Hypocrites,liars & ratbags, the lot of 'em.
Posted by Bill Pounder, 21/12/2011 5:33:30 PM
Do what the pig industry has done. Stop whinging and find away to reduce your input costs and make more money. The answer is there it just needs someone to think about outcomes and not problems.
Posted by holisticmick, 22/12/2011 5:38:06 AM
At least Holisticmick continues to be optimistic, he's gunna need it.

Wait till it is applied to agriculture and the rest of the world is mostly doing nothing. Absolute stupidity by the Australian government.

Posted by Archibald, 22/12/2011 8:07:37 AM
Well said, holisticmick! In industry, if there's a problem, you have to find a way around it, find a way to remove it, or find a way to neutralise the impact of the problem. All I see here, day after day, is comments indicating that someone else (usually the government) is to blame and someone else (usually the government) should fix it (plus the usual abuse from Mr Mott).

So here's a little challenge for our old mate Bill Pounder: give yourself a Christmas gift this year. Find a solution, not a problem.

Posted by Reap What You Sow, 22/12/2011 8:58:00 AM
Just remember Agriculture is "excluded" from the carbon tax. Thanks Mr Windsor. Import milk from China next?
Posted by Maverick, 22/12/2011 9:31:23 AM
OMG, the pig industry has died. Where has the likes of the monk been living? In Utopiaville eating import bacon? Typical statement from someone who has know business brain.
Posted by David, 22/12/2011 10:39:43 AM
To reap what you sow, you arrogant sob. Who introduced the carbon tax? Who is to blame?

We expect to find a way to fix it at the next election.

It is just so easy for you and holisticmuck to tell someone else to find a fix. If you are that clever why don't you suggest a fix?

Whilst Windsor had ag excluded directly the indirect costs will still be there.

Please dish 'em up another good serve, will you Motty?

Posted by daw, 22/12/2011 11:17:57 AM
David if you have been up with the news. Pig producers will be able to collect methane from their ponds etc and generate electricity as well as claim a carbon credit.
Posted by Holisticmick, 22/12/2011 11:53:48 AM
I think you may have been breathing to much of your own methane Holisticmick.
Posted by Loc Hey, 22/12/2011 1:19:05 PM
RWYS do you live on planet earth? Who do you think is to blame for the problem in the first place? Who introduced the carbon tax in the first place, you twit? Give us all a Christmas pressy and think before you make such stupid naive comments. About the the only thing you said that makes any logic is to ' find away around it, find ways to remove the problem' well we all know what that is. Vote the loonies who gave us the problem out of power and get rid of the carbon tax.
Posted by Loc Hey, 22/12/2011 1:34:07 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
16 December, 2011
15 December, 2011
19 December, 2011
16 December, 2011
POLL
Q: Do you think Indonesia would have cut its import quota if the June ban didn't happen?

Yes
(19.2%)

No
(71.9%)

Unsure
(8.8%)

Total Votes: 452
Poll Date: 19 December, 2011

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...