News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 BSE "mischief" damaging beef industry 

BSE "mischief" damaging beef industry

22 Feb, 2010 04:41 PM
A SENATE committee has been accused of being "mischievous" for pursuing the decision behind the proposal to lift the ban on beef imports from countries which have had BSE, or mad cow disease.

Cattle Council of Australia president, Greg Brown, this morning said the Rural and Regional Affairs Committee had been "mischievous" in raising the issue of BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy) so publicly through the inquiry.

He went further to say the public airing of the issue was "damaging" to the Australian cattle industry.

In a fiery third inquiry into the decision to relax the import ban, the Cattle Council itself was also accused of mischievous statements by Liberal Party Senator, Julian McGauran, who said the previous Government did not intend to change the BSE arrangements as claimed by the council.

Mr Brown criticised the committee for raising the issue of BSE "in the public eye to this extent".

The claims were fiercely rejected by committee chairman, Fiona Nash, and a retraction was requested (although not given) by NSW Senator Bill Heffernan.

Mr Brown explained the decision, and support of it by major cattle industry bodies, was about "valuing a trading customer" and Australia's most important market.

He said America's cattle trade should not be seen as Australia's enemy, adding he did not foresee major changes to the amounts of beef being sent to Australia as a result of the change.

Cattle Council director, Peter Hall, went further to say the benefits to the Australian cattle industry should be seen as an "insurance policy".

"We advocate free trade," he said.

Meat and Livestock Australia managing director, David Palmer said it was his view that Australia would not be swamped with large increases in beef imports.

Mr Brown did not rule out that this decision could be about helping the US get access to the prized Korean and Japanese beef markets.

WA Liberal Senator, Chris Back, said he feared the impacts of the decision could be two-fold – the possible deterioration of the domestic market by the threat of imports, and the dissipation of Australia's market advantage in countries like Japan and Korea.

Mr Palmer reiterated his belief that Australia's industry was strong and robust would not suffer from this decision.

The new trade arrangements start next Monday.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If Mr Palmer beleives the beef industry is "strong and robust" then he is reading too much MLA propaganda.
Posted by john from tamworth, 22/02/2010 11:54:21 AM
Cattle Council director, Peter Hall........ "We advocate free trade," he said. Free trade hey, does that mean we'll be getting all the benefits our competitors in the EU and US get?? Or does it mean we will be free to push poo uphill in a bid to compete with them? Or does it just mean that the biggest players in the industries, who make the biggest political donations, are free to continue to rip both producers and consumers off with impunity?
Posted by bill, 22/02/2010 1:48:53 PM
Unfortunately every one has forgotten how many years it will be before Australia has full and free access to the US beef market. Wasn't it 18 years, based on the free trade agreement our politicians stupidly signed us up too. Please correct me if I'm wrong. So it's all level from the USA side and Mount Everest from the farmers perspective in Australia. Free Trade "poppycock" as usual.
Posted by John Michelmore, 22/02/2010 3:25:50 PM
Yes, let him ask the hard working people of Young how robust things are. He could check the Darling Downs towns where workers lost jobs. Less processors means less competition and even lower prices. Time to bring forward the "sunset clause" John Anderson envisaged on MLA. While at it, get rid of all the others lining their pockets with producers cash.
Posted by Sweeney, 22/02/2010 3:47:42 PM
It is producers who need to make decisions on whose meat enters the country not public servants whose incomes are never effected by very bad decisions. Why are producer bodies not up in arms and getting public. Media is the place to air problems, and it is media who get things changed. Meat producers must not be afraid of using this as a means of using public support to achieve an outcome they want. Bodies such as NFF it seems to me are ineffectual - I asked for them to support me in lobbying the Federal Attorney general to help me achieve a truly national scheme of consumer protection and financial assurance to protect clients who entrust any money to a lawyer. They refused to even consider its importance, despite the fact that lawyers handle hundreds of millions of client funds which is unprotected. I have used the media to help achieve having the national legal profession legislation scrapped, so meat producers should stand up and demand Australia is protected from foreign cattle diseases.
Posted by fight for your protection, 22/02/2010 6:15:20 PM
I was in the US last year and both Australia and New Zealand are viewed as naive and idealistic. Only a fool would allow product from the US into Australia. It appears that people like Peter Hall are under the mistaken belief that the US cattle industry is endorsing their foolhardy play because they are interested in free trade. Wake up and smell the vested interest. By the way I am a free trade believer although after traveling to the US I now understand how the game is really played.
Posted by graingrower, 22/02/2010 6:55:35 PM
Cattle Council director Peter Hall and presumably the President Greg Brown still believe, with their hands on their hearts, in the “Free Trade” level playing field theory. After more than one quarter of century of waiting for this shinning light to materialise, I have to wonder if Mr Hall and Brown are living on a planet that the rest of us are yet to visit. There is a complete ignorance by this Government captured, tax payer funded peak council to the fact that agriculture subsidies, tariffs and other trade restrictions are still being applied by nearly all our trading partners to Australian agriculture exports and, based on foreign sovereign food security, this scenario will not change. To actively champion a theory that died with the dinosaurs and that would effectively reduce their own membership base and destroy principal domestic meat works defies all logic. According to Hansard, dated 5 February 2010, such is the contempt they have for their membership that Cattle Council, as a member of the RMAC, that after first learning of this change on 28 July 2009 they stayed quite about the change until it was announced on 20 October 2009.
Posted by The Middle Stump, 23/02/2010 12:31:41 AM
The behaviour of the Cattle Council on Mad Cow is beyond belief. Their actions with cause a great upheavel within the farming and grazing community and perhaps a positive result in future primary producer representation at all levels.
Posted by Realist, 23/02/2010 4:54:28 AM
Mr Brown's and Mr Palmer's statements will now be on record as they sit in front of the Senate Inquiry and predict no change to beef imports. They may be retired from their positions when beef imports hit 50 000 tons but I will remind the press how these men have sold out on the producers who fund them. The poorly advised Ministers Crean, Roxon and Burke will have their day of judgement during the Federal election campaign. I expect all those mentioned to defend their position at Armidale on the 27 th. They owe it to Australian Beef Producers to come out of their ivory tower in Parliament and NFF house explain their position to the people who raise the cattle and fund their wages.
Posted by Brad Bellnger, 23/02/2010 5:50:26 AM
I know this Government is all Free Trade, Level Playing Field etc but when I heard Greg Brown yesterday I almost choked on my coffee - this was what I thought was a fair dinkum bloke with a cattle property himself. Come on Brownie, who bought you or have they done a brain drain on you. You have lost my vote and by golly there are plenty more who will be standing up at even little AgForce meetings and the like saying we have been betrayed by someone we trusted...shame on you.
Posted by Mrs Mac, 23/02/2010 6:35:39 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
18 February, 2010
19 February, 2010
21 February, 2010
POLL
Q: Has the Meat Standards Australia system been good for sales of Australian red meat?

Yes
(46.6%)

No
(33.2%)

Undecided
(20.2%)

Total Votes: 410
Poll Date: 21 February, 2010

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...