News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 ACCC to be called to account at fertiliser inquiry 

ACCC to be called to account at fertiliser inquiry

10 Nov, 2008 05:22 PM
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission will have some explaining to do when it appears before parliamentary committee investigating the enormous hike in fertiliser prices this Friday.

The ACCC reported in August that nothing dodgy was going on with fertiliser prices even though they have near trebled in some cases in recent years.

But the Senate Select committee which has been investigating the matter since the start of the year isn't convinced.

Chairman Bill Heffernan says he wants the ACCC to explain how it can say there is no collusion or cartel behaviour taking place in the fertiliser industry when the committee has received evidence to the contrary.

Senator Heffernan said his committee has received in camera evidence from people who've felt too intimidated by the major fertiliser companies to appear publicly, but have said privately they were appalled at the events of the past 12 months, especially in relation to "hoarding and gauging" he said.

"I'll be interested to hear what the ACCC has to say because we have got the proof to show us there's a global monopoly on rock phosphate," Senator Heffernan said.

"Any company that has 70pc of fertiliser sales and 100pc of manufacturing would appear to have a monopoly power," Senator Heffernan said.

At a conference in Sydney last week, Senator Heffernan said suppliers have expressed surprise at the unjustified fortnightly increases in prices, while there is now evidence of increasing supplies up to 2011 and a sharp drop in prices over the next year.

In its report to Government in August the ACCC concluded international supply and demand factors only were to blame for fertiliser costing so much.

The findings were made during a broader investigation into the rising cost of groceries, but are at odds with evidence being gathered by this Senate committee.

Already the inquiry has exposed specific cases of market manipulation, market abuses because of too few players in the market and the export of Australian fertiliser to countries such as Brazil which has exacerbated the domestic supply shortage.

The ACCC said in its report that significant rises in fertiliser prices in Australia were mainly attributable to rapidly increasing global fertiliser prices.

It said these prices were caused by the big increase in world demand for fertilisers due to the expansion in agricultural production, particularly in grain for food, livestock feed and bio-fuels.

It also blamed rises in costs of production associated with the increasing cost of energy.

At the time the report was released, Senator Heffernan declared the ACCC "as useless as tits on a bull" in this case.

"The ACCC is sadly but predictably a basket of hot air with no forensic power within it," Senator Heffernan said in August.

The fertiliser inquiry resumed this week after it had to break to an emergency hearing on the Lower Lakes and Coorong during September.

It will report to the Government early next month.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If you don't look in the right places there won't be a problem.
Posted by THE FARMER, 10/11/2008 5:49:24 PM
Funny how the big phosphate companies including IPL have recently and miraculously decided to close or partially close their DAP and MAP plants for "maintenance" simultaneously. Not that this would artificially alter the supply and demand situation in the wake of shelving or delaying mining/factory expansion as they look at demand falling with global slow down. A Triple NOTHING more like it when it comes to phosphate fertiliser.
Posted by In the know, 11/11/2008 6:56:09 AM
Not sure how many years ago, but when there were low world prices for fertilizer, one Australian manufacturer claimed that it had to apply higher prices because costs in Australia were higher. The same company now applies "world parity" prices and recorded a 91% increase in profits, where from, mostly from manufacturing. I think their policy is "charge what they can bear".
Posted by Gecko, 11/11/2008 9:12:55 AM
20 years in the Industry, finished with THEM now. THEY run the show and will continue to do so, THEY follow the lead of the big boys o'seas that tell THEM what to do! No alternative in country, other big supplier is owned by its 2 biggest reseller customers! They work on the % basis off a price list 8% of $1800 retail is better than 8% of $500. So no-one bucks the system at reseller level and THEY do what they want and laugh at BIll and the ACCC.
Posted by Been there, done that, 11/11/2008 10:47:36 AM
The ACCC is and has always been useless and pays only lips service to their job. It is time they were over hauled and some real workers actually interested in their jobs apply. I am so sick of these type of bodies doing a bad job and yet no one is sacked !! As for fertilizer companies they should be fined heavily and the fine given to farmers to buy their fertilizer with so a heavy heavy fine so they don't dare do it again.
Posted by Davo, 11/11/2008 11:32:19 AM
I have repeatedly heard from various fert sales people that supply is tight, farmers better jump in and place their orders now or heaven forbid they may miss out on supply. why if this is the case does every rural newspaper, radio station and tv station carry advertisements trying to sell their fertilizer, if it is that short it should not need selling ???
Posted by sceptic, 11/11/2008 12:19:58 PM
The solution is simple. Grower organisations work with a reliable supplier overseas to bring in 25k tonne shipments. Growers will have to pay upfront but the supplier needs to provide a fixed price. I estimate the price will be around 20-30% lower than local prices. This is a good time to arrange the shipment as freight prices are very low now.
Posted by terry, 11/11/2008 1:37:26 PM
The demand for fertilizer will fall off in December - watch the price go down then. The major fertilizer company is its own worst enemy because farmers have not fertilized their crops as they should, hence lower production, lower returns, less money to buy fertilizer again next year. The ACCC has never had any teeth; sack them all and give others a go. People who are prepared to do the job they should have done. It seems to be promoting big business. Yet again let's abolish the customer.
Posted by bob, 11/11/2008 6:29:06 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Will farmers be better off if agriculture is included in a carbon emissions trading system?

Yes - selling carbon will make us more profitable
(23%)

No - carbon taxes will increase our costs
(46%)

Undecided - We need more information
(31%)

Total Votes: 574
Poll Date: 09 November, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...