News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 $300m for on-farm irrigation works 

$300m for on-farm irrigation works

06 Oct, 2009 02:41 PM
The National Farmers' Federation is claiming a win for irrigators after the Federal Government this afternoon called for proposals for a new $300 million on-farm irrigation efficiency grants program.

The Government says the program will help deliver a long-term sustainable future for Murray-Darling Basin irrigation communities.

Water Minister, Senator Penny Wong, said the funding would help irrigation communities adjust to a future with less water by supporting farmers investing in water-saving irrigation practices and technology.

NFF president David Crombie said the lobby group had been calling on the Government to accelerate delivery of water infrastructure projects, many of which have been delayed by negotiations with the States.

"Today’s announcement goes some way towards restoring the balance between buybacks and infrastructure upgrades," Mr Crombie said.

"The Government has delivered on NFF calls for this specific on-farm project and will partner with irrigators to continue their already-demonstrated ability to increase efficiency, share water savings with the environment and create jobs in the bush.

"This investment is good for production at a time when the world is crying out for food and fibre and we excel at producing it, despite the challenges we face.

"It’s also beneficial for the environment, stimulates employment and supports regional communities."

The On-Farm Irrigation Infrastructure Program was open to irrigators in the Southern Basin and the Lachlan River catchment.

The new program invites competitive bids to deliver cost-effective ‘tranches’ of on-farm investment from partners such as irrigation water providers, peak-industry groups and catchment management authorities.

The program has been modelled on the arrangements trialled through the On-Farm Irrigation Efficiency (Pilot Projects) program. It will invest in more efficient irrigation systems in areas where a long-term economic and environmental benefit can be demonstrated.

The projects must help secure a long-term sustainable future for irrigation communities; deliver substantial and lasting returns of water to the environment to secure real improvements in river health; and deliver value for money.

* More information on this program and Water for the Future is available at www.environment.gov.au.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Sounds like a good idea but let's not allow it to be one of those projects that offers money to farmers who are already leading edge managers and have sufficient finance to contribute a required percentage. This ends up employing taxpayers' funds to enhance private asset values while the worst practices continue on poor, badly managed farms. There has to be a triage system that identifies where the most bang for the buck will be obtained then the relevant farmers or irrigation entities need to be forced or cajoled into co-operating or else the money gets returned for other uses. We have to stop assuming beneficial outcomes accrue automatically from injection of massive funding. The funds effectively come from education, transport, health budgets etc so the water savings are offset by sacrifices by others. Let's use these funds ethically.
Posted by Mick, 7/10/2009 1:08:17 PM
Why is it though that with all these Government schemes there must be a large intermediary "delivery partner" which is entitled to significant administration fees which then lowers the cost effectiveness and coverage of the available funding? Are the Minister and the Government now admitting their departments ineffectiveness at assessing and controlling a simple grant and water recovery scheme?
Posted by Mijalu, 7/10/2009 4:50:49 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Should the Liberal Party follow Malcolm Turnbull's lead and push for amendments to Labor's emissions trading scheme (ETS)?

Yes - an amended ETS is needed
(39.7%)

No - they should flatly oppose the ETS
(51.9%)

Other
(8.5%)

Total Votes: 567
Poll Date: 04 October, 2009
BLOGS
30 September, 2009

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...