News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Storm gathers over Great Southern plantations 

Storm gathers over Great Southern plantations

04 Oct, 2009 07:43 PM
A SALE of the failed Great Southern Group's valuable pulpwood timber schemes for about $500 million could be concluded by the end of this month. But the prospects of a long-term future for its horticultural schemes appear to be receding fast.

Several bids for the forestry plantation assets are being considered from potential domestic and overseas buyers by Great Southern's receivers, McGrathNicol, which should yield an eventual return for thousands of investor-growers. That should result in a new entity responsible for managing the 1998 to 2008 timber operations to replace the insolvent Great Southern Managers Australia whose lack of funding has threatened all of the group's 45 managed investment schemes.

Buyer interest in the pulpwood businesses was stimulated by the recent $345 million sale of the timber plantation operations of Timbercorp, the other big MIS group to collapse this year.

"We have been encouraged by the robust competition for these assets, and are obviously pleased that this response will provide investors in these schemes with a range of options to consider in the near future," said Tony McGrath of McGrathNicol on Friday.

Final bids must be submitted by October 31, with a decision expected soon after.

The investor-growers will vote on the eventual successful deal, which should result in the paying off of much, if not all, of the bank debt secured against the pulpwood assets.

But the position of other investors in the horticulture schemes such as almonds, olives, grapes and vineyards and the softwood and high-value timber businesses is a great deal less certain.

Mr McGrath said there had been "limited" interest in replacing Great Southern Managers and that the proposals received so far had been "largely underdeveloped".

Describing the challenges in maintaining many of the schemes as "extraordinary", Mr McGrath held out little hope of most of the schemes surviving in the longer term.

The likely result is that they will be wound up.

"Unfortunately, without a solvent responsible entity and funds to meet operational and maintenance expenditure, most of [them] are highly unlikely to be able to continue operating," he said.

McGrathNicol has estimated that the horticultural schemes alone will need $30 million spent on them in the next year, with as much as $200 million required to bring them to fruition.

A short-term funding lifeline to keep them going until the middle of this week has now run out. But the receivers said they had obtained additional financial help from the group's bankers to give them more time to work out which schemes might survive and which had little or no future.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
By having a good sale on forestry assets doesn't justify a giveaway price on horticultural assets. Apparently, there are always people in the know who want the agriculture assets e.g. Boundary Bend, experts in their field, which is the only buyer for Timbercorp olive assets; and yet the receiver says that there is insufficient interest. Come on - the expert is interested, how come not anyone else? I guess the expert see something that none of us do. Maybe, we are not fit for the job. After all, all we do is give away at the highest bidder, no reserve price. Anyone can do that.
Posted by newcomer, 22/10/2009 9:46:49 AM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 October, 2009
01 October, 2009
02 October, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Liberal Party follow Malcolm Turnbull's lead and push for amendments to Labor's emissions trading scheme (ETS)?

Yes - an amended ETS is needed
(39.7%)

No - they should flatly oppose the ETS
(51.9%)

Other
(8.5%)

Total Votes: 567
Poll Date: 04 October, 2009
BLOGS
30 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Northern Beef Week
 
MON0152
 
Photo Library
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
2UE Royal Broadcast
 
Land Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
The Land Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...