News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Rural research to be slashed in budget 

Rural research to be slashed in budget

06 May, 2009 04:00 AM
RURAL research is in for a hammering in next week's Federal Budget, with Government sources revealing one major research corporation will lose significant funding, while another will be shut down altogether.

The Government has been putting the word out for weeks that next week's budget is going to be a tough one, with forecasts the budget deficit announced next Tuesday night could be as big as $68 billion – compared to a the $22.3 billion forecast last year.

A Government spokesman told FarmOnline this week that the budget for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) will be slashed by about $3 million, while Land and Water Australia will be closed down by the end of the year.

RIRDC conducts research and development into new and highly specialised industries as well as national rural affairs. It also organises the high-profile Rural Women's Award.

Land and Water Australia, which researches and helps farmers apply sustainable land and water management, will receive less than half of last year's allocated funding and measures are now in place to steadily wind up the organisation by December.

It's not expected that there will be any other cuts to research and development corporations in this year's budget.

However, it seems the media had been contacted before staff at the agencies concerned, and board members have been ordered not to approach the media until after Budget night.

The spokesman said the cuts at the RIRDC were in "the context of a tough budget" and the difficult economic environment where the Government was still looking at how it met all its priorities and commitments.

They said "tough decisions had to be made".

It's understood that the Government has asked RIRDC to ensure its savings and funding cutbacks don't affect research and work being financed by levy-paying industries.

The Government wants the savings to be made through cuts in administration and "lower priority activities".

Staff from the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry will be asked to work closely with Land and Water Australia to look at existing research contracts to determine what needs to be completed and what work has priority.

The spokesman said the closure of the agency was not an easy decision, but it was hoped much of its work could be picked up by the department.

They said DAFF hoped to maximise the chance of many programs affected by these cuts still being delivered to "minimise any disruption to research".

Some fear Land and Water Australia may have been an easy target for the Government because it does not have farmer levy payers, although it does much of its work in collaboration with other commodity and industry-focused research and development corporations.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Cut out the total waste of funds by eliminating all GM research.
Posted by ggwagga, 6/05/2009 7:18:01 AM
The demise of Land and Water Australia is not before time. It only ever served as a broker to dish out public monies to other public science agencies. Its soft social science focus and lack of independence and contact with industry scientists made it one of the most ineffective agencies in delivering a public good. RIRDC is a different kettle of fish. Compared with the other research corporations, eg. GRDC, RIRDC actually produced good science for rural Australia and was not tied to the commercial interests of large corporations.
Posted by Mangiri, 6/05/2009 8:12:26 AM
Cutting funds on rural research - how predictable! The money crisis has hit all other industries so they cut funding to the one area in Australia that might be able to aid in pulling the economy out of the mess created by the GREED IS GOOD crowd. I'll bet the funding to the arts doesn't suffer!
Posted by Trugger, 6/05/2009 8:17:55 AM
I'm with you 'Trugger'! I am sure the various Arts Councils will have the resources and ability to feed and cloth our global brothers and sisters. What we are witnessing is the slow-mo of the predicted imploding of the total incompetence, entwined with an unhealthy level of ignorance and arrogance of yet another Federal and/or State Labor Government whose only mathematical ability is solely dependent upon fingers and toes. These 'Social Democrat' amateurs were handed the most 'eniable Western economy' on Novemeber 27th 2007. Given this competitive advantage we are now about to have a "temporary" budget DEFICIT for the fiscal year 2009/2010 of $70billion which equates to a net loss of approx. $90billion when you add in the residual SURPLUS they inherited! Bloody hell, little wonder Malcolm Turnbull is steadfastly predicting that PM KRudd and fellow Queenslander and, career Public Servant, Wayne Swan will never deliver a "surplus budget" during their time on the 'fiscal throne'. Don't let's discuss the Global Warming/Climate Change mandated scam, please! These people should be cultivating 'striped suntans' at HM pleasure for treason!
Posted by Clark Goodwin, 6/05/2009 9:38:40 AM
Interesting comments Clark, I wonder what Malcolm's response would have been. As an investor (forced) in R&D, I received no return on my investment at any stage of the great ecomomic cycle under Johny/Malcolm's team. I think the whole system should be reviewed with the choice being made by the current contributors as to how much they would invest voluntarily. I think the whole compulsory research levies scam should be exposed as a waste of resourses which many forced contributors could use to ride out this desperate time for their industries.
Posted by bazza, 6/05/2009 1:13:17 PM
The ALP is sending Australia in the direction of national bankruptcy by making the Federal Treasury look like a hedge fund. Hand outs, borrowings and guarantees that we can't afford and can't retire have repositioned Australia as an economic risk. Now one of the only sectors (agriculture) that has continuously supported the growth and development of the nation looks like having its R&D budgets cut disproportionately. This will impact negatively on productivity, innovation and competitiveness.

These huge spending cuts prove that for all its faith in hand outs, guarantees and stimulus packages the Government doesn't believe it can spend its way out of debt, even when the spending is likely to produce revenue streams for the future. This government may be in control of a run away wagon, but it has done nothing to slow it down or minimise the potential damage. That’s poor and the move to slash ag-spending is unwise.

With cuts to R&D budgets in Australian agriculture we must, now more than ever, focus on getting big gains for small investments. Then we will be able to continue to self-fund R&D until the economy recovers. Failing to commit to do this will cause regress from our position, as a world leader in the production and supply of agricultural products and this will deepen, as well as extend our economic problems…Paul.

Posted by paul, 6/05/2009 1:54:34 PM
Trugger, you've hit the nail right on the Head. No Labour Government would dare touch the Arts. Labor gets us into deficits - now all we have to do is wait for the next Fed election, get the Libs back in, and get this mess sorted out!
Posted by Forest vs Trees, 6/05/2009 8:21:18 PM
Bazza's comments brings to mid the Macquarie Bank. The Mac Bank made about a billion dollars profit but paid only 1.5pc tax. In other words they use all the infrastructure roads, education etc that every one else pays for but don't pay their fair share.

They also want to influence govt spending and work hard to get govt contracts. Now that brings me to Bazza's comments. He wants to benefit from all the R& D that everyone else pays for but he doesn't want to pay. Most of the benefit from R&D takes about 20 years to arrive, so Bazza is benefiting most from R&D work paid for in 1989 and before.

The average benefit from R&D dollars is $10-$15 benefit for every $1 spent. Now that is a lot better than buying shares, interest in banks and even the return on gambling (average only 60 cents for every $1 invested).

Bazza, if you are fair dinkum you should be investing your beer money into research, not bagging it.

Posted by Annoyed, 6/05/2009 8:43:22 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Land and Water Australia is set to be dismantled as a result of funding cuts in next week's federal budget.
Land and Water Australia is set to be dismantled as a result of funding cuts in next week's federal budget.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
01 May, 2009
04 May, 2009
05 May, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the swine flu outbreak caused you to reconsider your consumption of pork products?

Yes
(6.9%)

No
(93.1%)

Total Votes: 580
Poll Date: 03 May, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...