News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Nation must embrace 'awful arithmetic' 

Nation must embrace 'awful arithmetic'

22 Dec, 2009 09:54 AM
THE Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, said after the Copenhagen summit that "Australia will do no less and no more than the rest of the world" to reach the goal of holding increases in world temperatures to two degrees.

To achieve this Australia would have to overcome the "awful arithmetic" of serious and sustained carbon emissions cuts that Professor Ross Garnaut described in the climate change review he prepared for the Federal Government.

Over the next 10 years Australians would need to bring their per capita emissions down from about 28 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year to about 16 or 17 tonnes.

The nation would need to reduce its carbon output by the maximum level proposed by the Government, 25 per cent of its 2000 emissions level by 2020, and follow through with a cut of up to 80 per cent by 2050. Other rich nations would have to make similar cuts, and developing countries, including China and India, must slow emissions growth significantly.

Domestically, cutting total emissions by a quarter in the next 10 years would require the nation to attack the problem on several fronts. The Government's target of using 20 per cent renewable power would have to be met or exceeded by 2020.

The forestry industry would have to drastically cut back logging in forests, and major plantations would have to be created as offsets for continuing use of coal-fired power plants.

Most economists and environmental scientists believe this will be difficult but possible.

Research by the Institute of Sustainable Futures in Sydney shows that vast amounts of energy could be saved by better managing peak load power generation. Coupled with wide-scale energy efficiency measures, and some localised, low-emissions power generation, greenhouse gas emissions from the power sector could be slashed.

"You could cut emissions by 10 per cent in 12 months," said the institute's director, Stuart White. "That's the low-hanging fruit – the easy part. The problem is that the price signals to do this aren't there at the moment."

A series of Australian and international studies, including exhaustive modelling by the Federal Treasury, shows that the long-term economic effect of wholesale change on this level will be small. If Australia were to follow the two-degree track to 2050, the effect would be a slowing of economic growth by a few months over four decades.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
For a start Kevie, you can do your bit by not flitting around the world with all your hanger on's, including your Butler. Just remember that Copenhagen contributed 41,000 tons of CO2.
Posted by jerangle, 22/12/2009 6:52:20 AM
Just as Copenhagen wraps up, North America has record Snowfalls, Snow has cut travel in Britain and Europe, and a reported 19 people have died. Can anyone show me a Bookie offering Each Way bets ?
Posted by 2 Degrees - above OR below, 22/12/2009 7:21:21 AM
If we develop nuclear power generation we don’t have to do anything destructive or stupid, little kevi won’t do this of course, he has his destructive agenda in place for political reasons.
Posted by Hot air, 22/12/2009 7:37:51 AM
Before Mr Rudd gets us to tackle further emissions reductions, how is he going to address the issues raised by Mr Peter Spencer at Cooma in relation to the situation of farmers and their ability to work their land as a result of the signing of the Kyoto treaty??????? Will he let this man die without facing the real facts of farming?
Posted by towardswellness, 22/12/2009 8:11:57 AM
....what is this moron on about ? Since sadly getting to power 2 years ago his 747 has rarely been parked in one place for more than about 5 minutes. He is unable to deliver on any promises. As an example the day after he came to office he claimed every school child in Australia would have a laptop computer at school. I ask my daughter every day whether she's received her laptop yet. Needless to say it hasn't arrived. Why make such a statement if you can't or don't want to deliver? His spruiking about global warming , ETS etc is along the same lines. Rudd is simply full of sh-t !!!!! Spend some more time at home please & discover what's happening at the grass roots level of your own country.
Posted by JMcL, 22/12/2009 9:11:10 AM
One country that appears to be missing in all of the verbal diarrhea, Russia. Where do they stand in Kevies grand plan?
Posted by jerangle, 22/12/2009 2:41:41 PM
How dumb is this fool we have for a pm. To say we have to cut back on logging and increase plantations as offsets for CO2. What an idiot. Locked up forests left to burn and look at how much CO2 that releases. At least logging has the carbon locked up in the timber. But that doesn't enable him to continue the fraud he is pushing and rip us all off with the tax he wants on us all.
Posted by Max, 22/12/2009 5:37:20 PM
Australias "awful arithmetic" ie our per capita carbon footprint is really a load of bollocks. It is best illustrated by our prime minister's Boeing 767. This is, when it's fully loaded a reasonably economical aircraft in terms of Lts/ per passenger kilometre. With just our prime minister on board the plane uses slightly less fuel but its Lts/pass/k arithmetic is awful. Similarly Australia is a big country, and the way Kyoto is written, with no allowance for soil carbon and bushfires etc, would have a fair sized carbon footprint whether anyone lived here or not. Put our meagre population of less than New York city in it, and like Kevs 767 the our per capita carbon looks pretty high. In reality, there is bugger all we can do about it on account of the size of the place, and if we all turned out the lights and went and lived in a cave for ever, it wouldn't make any difference. If every other country on earth was as lightly poulated as Australia, the earth wouldn't have a problem.
Posted by Will, 23/12/2009 12:40:11 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
18 December, 2009
21 December, 2009
POLL
Q: What will be the centre piece of your Christmas feast?

Beef
(9.4%)

Lamb
(8%)

Ham
(26.2%)

Turkey
(20.8%)

Seafood
(18.1%)

Vegetarian
(7.8%)

Other
(9.6%)

Total Votes: 562
Poll Date: 18 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...