News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Govt to go $100b in the red 

Govt to go $100b in the red

06 Apr, 2009 05:58 AM
The deficit threatens to reach $100 billion over the next three years, the Finance Minister, Lindsay Tanner, has warned, throwing into deeper doubt prospects for paid maternity leave and extra cash for universities in next month's budget.

As the Government unveiled measures yesterday to counter unemployment and protect the mortgages of jobless people, Mr Tanner talked down expectations of a recovery in the world economy next year as "jumping the gun".

This week about nine million people will start receiving payments of up to $900 as part of the second round of stimulus measures designed to shore up the sagging economy.

However, Mr Tanner moved to stem demands for more spending, playing down speculation of a third financial stimulus and warned of the "very serious challenge" Australia faced in terms of budgetary restraints.

The Government is projecting deficits totalling nearly $100 billion over the next three years, "and there's every chance that that figure will be revised upwards", Mr Tanner said.

Asked about reports the Government was framing the budget on the basis of a world recovery next year, he told the Nine Network: "I think that's jumping the gun somewhat."

The projected deficit was sustainable, "but we cannot afford to allow those kinds of deficits to continue indefinitely, because, if we do, then we will get into serious economic problems", Mr Tanner said.

He acknowledged that paid maternity leave and more funding for higher education and innovation were among the areas where it was "a lot harder" than anticipated six to nine months ago to cater for in the budget, although he was not suggesting they were off the table.

On the need for more stimulus measures, Mr Tanner said there was now "a very large amount of stimulus" in the economy.

"There is a lot of money flowing, both by cuts in interest rates and through the Government's packages and, of course, the money flowing from the second package is really only just starting to get moving".

There was also the cash being injected into new homes, school grants and housing insulation, and there would be significant tax cuts from mid-year.

"But I would not rule out further stimulus. We have always taken the position that whatever is required to sustain jobs, to sustain economic growth, will be done," Mr Tanner said.

The shadow treasurer, Joe Hockey, told Network Ten that the Coalition could oppose further stimulus measures contained in the budget.

It opposed waste and mismanagement, and the Government was now borrowing $2.2 billion a week to fund itself, he said.

The public might think the Government was doing a good job by handing out money.

"But we are experienced in government. We know you have to at some time pay off Labor's debt, and we know that the cash splash is not generating jobs."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Does this mean we have to look forward to the 20+% interest rates the Hawke/Keating government gave us?
Posted by Ted O'Brien., 7/04/2009 7:56:48 AM
Labor is bankrupting the country. It is easy to be popular when you are giving away the nation's prosperity.
Posted by Don, 7/04/2009 9:40:29 AM
What do you expect when you have people in government that can't get a job in private enterprise. They would send the employers broke. They're like leeches: suck out all the blood and leave Aust with nothing. After all assets are sold to overseas monopolies to try and balance the books they fall into the same fold as banks, lawyers, financial, and insurance companies - they can legally fleece you and get away with it.
Posted by petro, 7/04/2009 3:02:45 PM
Wake up you two. The 20% interest rates we had back then were world wide. The same as now, the lowest interest rates in 40 years, worldwide again in developed countries. As for you Don, have a look what the rest of the world is doing trying to get out of this financial mess. Are they sitting there saving their money or are they spending? Just get in the real world.
Posted by Hensby, 7/04/2009 3:16:05 PM
Don't forget Whitlam Ted. He started the rot with spending on 'Blue Poles' and such non-government areas of responsibility. Now it is the environment with the purchase of productive farms to protect fauna and flora that previously happily coexisted with productive pursuits that helped our country stay solvent. Maybe we will be able to sell the greenies to the Martians as slaves to pay back our debts.
Posted by Common Cents, 7/04/2009 3:26:23 PM
Another huge debt to be repaid by the next Liberal government. Can't beat Labor - federal or state - to run up a huge debt that has to be repaid by others. Why wouldn't Rudd be popular while handing out cash to all and sundry?
Posted by richo, 7/04/2009 7:15:35 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 April, 2009
01 April, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you think Kevin Rudd needs to eat more red meat?

Yes
(89.4%)

No
(7.5%)

Other
(3.1%)

Total Votes: 548
Poll Date: 05 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...