News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Carbon capture 'unfeasible' 

Carbon capture 'unfeasible'

27 May, 2010 09:01 AM
THE environmentalist Tim Flannery has withdrawn his support for carbon capture and storage as an answer to combating climate change, saying he now believes it would be economically unachievable.

The former Australian of the Year, who has championed CCS and projects such as Santos' $700 million Moomba storage project in South Australia, said he had changed his view on the idea of capturing carbon and storing it underground during a trip to Germany last week.

Professor Flannery, who sits on the sustainability advisory board of Siemens, said he formed the view after talking with lead technicians from the company, which is itself involved in developing a number of trial CCS projects.

''I must say that I was rather shocked by what I heard,'' he said. ''Their view is that sure, carbon capture and storage is technically possible and all of the elements are in place now, and we understand enough to start building full-scale plants. So why aren't people building commercial scale plants with carbon capture and storage? Their argument was that it is economically unfeasible, and if it isn't happening now it simply is not going to happen in the future.

''I have been a great proponent of carbon capture and storage because I believed it was just essential particularly in places like China. But … having come back from that meeting and met the world's experts in this area, I have a less hopeful view of carbon capture and storage.''

Professor Flannery said the federal government should commit funds towards geothermal energy, solar photovoltaic energy and ''possibly even nuclear'' to meet Australia's future energy demands.

''There is still a very significant element in the Labor Party that believes coal is the future. That can still be an acceptable belief … because there is the promise that carbon capture and storage will be developed on time and will start pushing for a responsible coal industry in the future,'' he said. ''But the idea that coal is the future is a big problem for us.''

Nick Otter, the chief executive of the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute, which has $100 million a year in funding committed by the federal government, said the major challenges of CCS were not insurmountable: ''The challenge is to address these barriers to create the conditions for the integration of these technologies at commercial scale and across a variety of applications.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
They still haven't satisfactorily arrived at eliminating the safety issues with CCS and nor are they likely with our technology. Finding suitable underground rock structures capable of containing the amount of CO2 to be buried is also not always going to be simple either. It is good to see Tim Flannery has come to a sensible judgement on the issue.
Posted by Trugger, 27/05/2010 9:32:05 AM
It will be interesting to see if Rudd and his headless swans, sorry chooks, will take notice of Tim Flannery. Money being put into the CCS should be directed immediately to sensible energy sources such as Geothermal and Nuclear.
Posted by jerangle, 27/05/2010 12:27:57 PM
Sure is good to see Tim prepared to be sensible and prepared to change his view to be more pragmatic about the issue. Parrticularly pleasing to see him support Geothermal after all it is clean, green, almost inexhaustable and very affordable.
Posted by daw, 27/05/2010 2:58:24 PM
Coal is cheap, dirty and dangerous. Each year on average 9000 people die from accidents in the coal industry. New technology Nuclear power is cheap clean and safe.
Posted by Siruke, 27/05/2010 3:53:53 PM
This guy is a total idiot who has never predicted one thing that has turned out to be correct and is just in it to sell doom and gloom books that make MONEY.
Posted by Loc Hey, 27/05/2010 7:40:40 PM
It is unfortunate that Flannery does not acknowledge the function of carbon in the soil as an initiative towards improved food security, rather than climate amelioration. There is a scientific and political opportunity here to increase energy capture from the sun for agriculture through biological farming that is the only pathway to carbon capture and nutritious food.
Posted by mangiri, 28/05/2010 9:18:59 AM
Carbon capture and storage is just one of a number of diversions that fit in the strategy of "let's look serious but do nothing". So many voters fit in the category of "Yes I'm concerned but I certainly don't want to make a sacrifice" that leaderless governments and gutless oppositions will continually just promise feasability studies and research rather than action. We need to stop our addiction to growth and move away from the culture of judging the value of everything simply in dollar terms.
Posted by Mick, 28/05/2010 9:28:29 AM
If he is a total idiot, Loccy, where does that leave you on the intellect scale?
Posted by Bushie Bill, 28/05/2010 9:30:31 AM
The best solution is for the whole World to reduce population numbers to around 2 billion people. Failing that grab your axx and kiss it goodbye
Posted by jaimie, 28/05/2010 10:01:08 AM
Probably light years ahead of you.
Posted by Loc Hey, 28/05/2010 10:23:55 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Tim Flannery.
Tim Flannery.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: How should the Government react to the mining tax backlash?

Scrap the new tax
(57.6%)

Increase the super profit margin at which it takes effect
(19.4%)

Apply it only to new mines
(5.1%)

Delay its introduction
(2.5%)

Other
(15.4%)

Total Votes: 644
Poll Date: 23 May, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...