News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Budget 09: Hobby farmers hit hard 

Budget 09: Hobby farmers hit hard

12 May, 2009 10:44 PM
Hobby farmers are to feel the pinch from this year's budget, with the Government to tighten the application of the rules on the use of non-commercial losses to prevent people on high incomes from offsetting excess deductions from non-commercial business activities against salary and other income.

The new tax measure will start in July this year and is expected to save more than $700 million over the next four years.

The new tax measure is being introduced to ensure excess deductions from unprofitable business activities cannot be used to reduce salary and wage income of high income earners.

Taxpayers with an adjusted taxable income over $250,000 will instead have excess deductions quarantined to the business activity.

The existing rules will continue to apply to taxpayers with an adjusted taxable income of $250,000 or less.

The new test for taxpayers with an adjusted income above $250,000 will restrict the ability of those taxpayers to claim losses for non-commercial activities that are more likely to be in the nature of lifestyle choices of hobbies.

Taxpayers will still have the ability to apply to the Commissioner of Taxation for relief from the rules if there are exceptional circumstances or because the nature of the activities means that a taxpayer is temporarily carrying on an uncommercial business but the activities they are undertaking are nonetheless independently assessed as commercially viable.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Is this discrimination against rural regions? This nonesense will reduce cash flow to the country. How about banning negative gearing on residential housing and share market investment as well...just to balance the argument?

How many public companies that invested in trees, etc have recently failed and how many of these companies included negatively geared investors and used local labour and shops?

Were these companies viable? The negative gearing in the residential housing business certianly helps investment in the cities. Are these investments viable? How does this help regional Australia?

Guess where the investors will take their money to now...it may not be to invest in the country areas. The very concept of negative gearing may indicate non viable...whatever the investment may be.

Posted by pepper, 13/05/2009 7:25:53 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Has the Federal Government gone too far into debt?

Yes
(86.8%)

No
(9.9%)

Undecided
(3.3%)

Total Votes: 873
Poll Date: 10 May, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Northern Beef Week
 
MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
2UE Royal Broadcast
 
Photo Library
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Land Subscriptions
 
The Land Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...