News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Agri investors not happy with returns 

Agri investors not happy with returns

03 Aug, 2009 07:20 AM
MOST agribusiness companies are not giving investors a decent return, a leading analyst has said.

The head of Austock Group's agriculture and chemicals research team, Paul Jensz, said 10¢ in the dollar was the bare minimum return on investment investors aimed for.

Most agribusiness companies were not achieving this.

Mr Jensz, who presented his analysis to the Australian Grains Conference, said ABB Grain and CBH Group in Western Australia had been the most consistent performers.

From 2003-09, ABB Grain had averaged a return on investment (ROI) of 8.6 per cent, compared with CBH’s 9.2 per cent, while AWB was 6.7 per cent and GrainCorp 4.6 per cent.

The projected ROIs for next year were ABB 13.1 per cent, AWB 8.2 per cent and GrainCorp 10.2 per cent.

ABB had an ROI of almost 16 per cent in 2003-04 when grain production reached a record 43.4 million tonnes.

CBH inthat year was about 13 per cent, AWB about 7 per cent and Graincorp about 7 per cent.

Mr Jensz said investors preferred a three to five-year period of steady returns but volatility meant they had to watch agribusiness companies' performance constantly.

He said deregulation and consolidation had widened the definition of a "grain company", and those farm-input companies were generally outperforming the main grain groups.

Incitec Pivot had had a very strong ROI, averaging well above 10 per cent and reaching more than 25 per cent in 2006-07.

Nufarm had averaged a constant ROI of 15 per cent, while Ridley Corp was close to 10 per cent, sometimes dipping below.

Elders, formerly Futuris Corp, averaged an ROI of less than 10 per cent, falling to almost zero in 2008-09.

"Ridley and Elders have improvement to do," Mr Jensz said.

He said agribusiness investors also had the choice of putting their money into overseas companies and these were generally outperforming their Australian counterparts.

Since 2006, Monsanto's ROI had risen from 15 per cent to a projected 35 per cent in 2011.

Similarly, Potash Corp, a Canadian fertiliser producer, had had a volatile but high ROI ride, ranging from 20 per cent to almost 50 per cent in 2008 to an estimated 35 per cent in 2011.

Viterra, the Canadian grains suitor of ABB Grain, had an average ROI of about 15 per cent.

Mr Jensz said agribusiness also had to be seen in the broader context of global and Australian non-agriculture benchmarks.

"Investment funds are very transportable," he said.

The ROI of the Australian Securities Exchange had averaged 20 per cent from 2006-08, while Indian chemical company Reliance had gone from almost 40 per cent to just under 20 per cent.

Interestingly, Vodafone, which everybody knew and used, averaged an ROI of about 10 per cent.

"That's as good as a grains company," Mr Jensz said.

Agriculture companies' future financial performance depended on two key issues, he said: food prices must rise, but consumers must be able to afford the food.

"A major issue is that consumers still expect cheap food," he said, but "must pay more for food over the next 20 years, otherwise they [the companies] will have more difficult issues".

Mr Jensz said carbon costs associated with emissions trading were part of the sustainability issue.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Well hello and how do you think we farmers are getting on who have to live on what we make from our farms. Mind you this would only be one step up from the MIS for trees. There is no money in farming and maybe the rest of the country will realise it now. Great idea for a tax dodge though.
Posted by Helen Clark, 3/08/2009 10:13:03 AM
I am sure the directors of these companies are raising their glasses to all those suckers who pay them the big commissions!
Posted by tigerdicky, 3/08/2009 1:55:45 PM
This article only states the bleeding obvious. This has long been known and dealt with by those struggling to feed the nation, be environmental stewards, deal with radical animal rights groups, the Greens, bloody minded no idea city centric political interference and Labor's ridiculous ETS, onerous legislation, mining companies and market and price-killing dominance by Coles and Woolworths. Would you start a business faced with all this and more? Good. I hope the investors keep whingeing. Maybe now agriculture will get the recognition it deserves. We don't want handouts or protection, just a fair go and a reasonable rate of return.
Posted by mbh, 4/08/2009 9:53:08 AM
Well shucks, you would have thought all those smart city investors, with their super highly paid managers, would have made an absolute fortune at a farming. And showed all the dumb peasants how to do it...
Posted by Qlander, 5/08/2009 8:55:31 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
31 July, 2009
30 July, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you think that organic food is better for your health than conventionally farmed produce?

Yes
(34.2%)

No
(57.9%)

Undecided
(7.9%)

Total Votes: 605
Poll Date: 02 August, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...