Opinion 
 Blogs 
 The week observed 
 Backyard farmers not getting the message 

Backyard farmers not getting the message

The revival of the backyard vegie patch and the boom in hobby farming shows there is urban interest in rural industries, but that interest is not being responded to adequately by industry leaders.

Judging by the reader comments that are posted daily on FarmOnline, most rural producers feel detached from urban food and fibre consumers. They feel unappreciated at the least and even insulted by the very public criticism the farm sector cops from urban groups, especially the often bizarre and inaccurate claims made by green groups.

Those feelings are fair enough, so it was good to see Meat and Livestock Australia fight back against the 'go veg and save the planet' mantra of some green groups.

As MLA argues, environmental protection is a core activity of every farmer if they are to survive in business on the land.

That is a battle of two big ideas - one responsible and mainstream, the other extreme - fighting over broad public perceptions of agriculture and the environment.

It strikes me that on the ground in the cities there is a large population torn between the two ideas as they embrace agriculture at there own level.

FarmOnline published a story from The Age on the weekend which detailed the revival of the backyard vegie patch. As the story points out, interest in home production stems from both a financial and food quality imperative.

As a self-confessed frustrated farmer who is making do in satisfying that interest by growing my a few vegies at home, I have found there are a few dollars to be saved, but mainly the appeal is in the satisfaction of getting my hands dirty and getting fresh air in my lungs.

But for others there is also a desire to produce one's own home-grown food because of what approaches a phobia about GM crops and farm pesticide contamination.

At the same time, on the fringes of our ever-expanding cities, once productive farmland is being turned into acreage and hobby farms to satisfy people wanting to live 'The Good Life'.

The question is: what is agricultural industry doing to communicate with these thousands of people who obviously have an interest in farming techniques, but often rely on the likes of 'Gardening Australia' and its heavy-handed message of organic-only production for their 'how-to' information?

The situation presents both a massive problem for industry leaders and a massive opportunity.

The good news is that there are thousands of people who don't have to be convinced to show an interest in rural production.

The bad news is that without good information about farming techniques, these hobby farmers could pose a threat in the event of a disease outbreak.

It's not enough for agriculture to just win the battle of the big ideas in public debate, but also to deliver on the details and win people over to best practice on the small scale.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The backyard farmer has got the message and may not like what they hear from the mainstream.....the focus of your article seems to be based on commerce, however a broader investigation may include much more fundamental issues such as provision of unmodified or contaminated food, the significant erosion of the open pollenation seed base, etc..... many of which are considered irrelevant by the increasingly larger suppliers/producers. Not forgetting the other fundamental .... relief from the 'sit at the desk lifestyle' being an effective exercise with a productive result.
Posted by pepper, 7/04/2009 9:10:42 AM
The point was that many backyard farmers take their advice from the mainstream media, which is fair enough, but that often does not cover the reasons why farmers do things the way they do. The challenge is for rural industry to communicate with these people, who obviously have an interest in food production but may not be aware of other methods available to them. There are also issues of quarantine, animal welfare etc, which many hobby farmers are unaware of - it is in the interests of everyone that industry communicates these issues to hobbyists.
Posted by Michael Thomson on 7/04/2009 10:55:52 AM
By the look of all the pretty flowers around Bridgetown the hobby blockers need some education on what is a good pasture and what's not. Blackberry, soursob, turnip, radish, thistles, cape tulip, salvation jane are not.
Posted by THE FARMER, 7/04/2009 6:49:12 PM
Michael, It is beyond any question of doubt, there are real dangers with GM and with toxic chemicals that are slathered on food and soil. Aside from all of that, there are immediate and long term detrimental impacts to the soil, soil biology and to consumers, where toxic chemicals and GMOs are used in food production. The widespread use of toxic chemicals and artificial fertilisers are fundamentally implicated in the drought events. Clever farmers understand how vitally important soil biology, organic matter and balanced nutrients are to sustainable production. Unfortunately many broad acre farmers have become dependent on a broad acre hydroponic system and just use their degraded soil to stand their crops in. Whilst they may get away with this for a period, it is totally unsustainable, both economically and environmentally. Farmers must also look at where their input dollars end up. With high input production a majority of dollars leave the district, hence the demise of small rural communities. All of this and the questionable eating qualities of many foods, has eroded the trust of farmers by consumers, hence the growth of back-yard vegetable patch. A classic example is the tasteless tomato from the supermarket - not a patch on the ones from your own garden. Need I say more?
Posted by ggwagga, 9/04/2009 7:22:17 AM
Michael Thomson is the Editor of FarmOnline. He has previously worked as the Canberra Parliamentary Press Gallery correspondent for the Rural Press group of agricultural newspapers, and as a senior reporter with Queensland Country Life.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you think Kevin Rudd needs to eat more red meat?

Yes
(89.4%)

No
(7.5%)

Other
(3.1%)

Total Votes: 548
Poll Date: 05 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...