Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Out Here 
 Conservation cows out to change ag's image 

Conservation cows out to change ag's image

Cattle get a hard time. They are implicated in the clearing of the Amazon, desertification in Africa, the global food crisis (because corn that might feed the hungry goes into making beef), and of course, their methane-rich ruminant belches are cooking us.

So it was refreshing, on a recent flying visit to England, to come across this sign on Black Down in Sussex.

The English Downs are described by my computer's dictionary as "ridges of undulating chalk and limestone hills, with few trees and used mainly for pasture".

However, Black Down has not been a down in living memory.

With the urbanisation of Sussex, a 40-minute train ride from central London, grazing stopped and the down became a forest whose main inhabitants were walkers from the leafy network of peri-urban villages surrounding it.

Then that remarkable institution, the British National Trust, exercised its zeal for historical authenticity and a certain amount of courage, and attacked Black Down with bulldozers.

A few dozen acres of trees were flattened, and a small mob of Angus "conservation cows" introduced.

The idea is that the cattle will stop tree regrowth, and that hillside meadows will eventually flourish again on Black Down.

Sadly, I don't think that the National Trust has been reading Alan Savory or Andre Voisin. The concept of high impact, short-term grazing followed by a long rest doesn't seem to be part of the program.

My impression was that these cattle are on the job full-time. That means that they snack repeatedly on the palatable plants, which eventually give up the ghost and disappear, while the blackberries, heather and other less tasty species get a free run.

It's a sequence that has seen big tracts of Australia go to the weeds.

As I picked my way through the blackberries and heather and Angus, and looked in vain for the early signs of meadow grasses, it seemed to me that the wrong sort of succession is well underway on Black Down.

I won't argue that cattle can be a destructive species. If NASA ever wanted to cost-effectively test a new spacecraft, for instance, it could just leave it in a paddock full of steer weaners for a week. If the steers hadn't licked, rubbed, trampled and crapped it into rubble within a few days, the craft would be fit for intergalatic travel.

But properly managed, cattle can be an unequivocal force for good. Which is why the Federal Government's reported blanket grazing ban on Toorale, the western NSW station it bought to secure its water rights, is puzzling.

Cattle are the best tool, bar none, that Toorale's new managers have for restoring the station's environment.

But I'll have a go at arguing that case in another post.

[My sincere thanks to NSW Farm Writers, which sponsored me to attend the International Federation of Agricultural Journalists congress in Austria in October. It was as a result of that sponsorship that I was able to make a short side-trip to the UK, a place I’d read millions of words on but had never seen. Another image from those few days is also attached to comfort farmers worried about a wet harvest. This was a wet harvest. The picture is of an unharvested Sussex wheat field covered in flourishing moss after six solid weeks of rain.]

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The sea-change in attitude to progressive agriculture in the pages of The Land coincided with Matt Cawood's appointment as Science and Environment specialist. It may have been a Fairfax-induced change. Whoever is responsible deserves a knighthood. Another brilliant column. Matt CAwood will be inducted into the Carbon Farmers of Australia Hall of Fame during the upcoming Carbon Faming Conference (18-19 November, 2008 at Orange NSW - www.carbonfarming.net.au or 6374 0329) for services to justices for farmers. Rural Press has been a beacon of sanity in a sea of madness on soil carbon rights for farmers. Congratulations.
Posted by michael kiely, 14/11/2008 10:47:58 AM
Great article and good to see some common sense returning to the "mad" British. I visited the Royal show in 1996 and was pleased to see a MAFF display pushing grazing livestock to restore the ecosystem. The trend to crops had demolished the hedges and trees vital to bird and wildlife survival. Crop insect sprays also contributed. The livestock dung and skin scurf (and dare I say methane) is very important to our ecosystem.
Posted by Common Cents, 18/11/2008 9:56:32 AM
Out Here
Out here, with Matt Cawood, wondering how it all works.
Conservation cows
Conservation cows
A wet harvest
A wet harvest
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Will farmers be better off if agriculture is included in a carbon emissions trading system?

Yes - selling carbon will make us more profitable
(23%)

No - carbon taxes will increase our costs
(46%)

Undecided - We need more information
(31%)

Total Votes: 574
Poll Date: 09 November, 2008

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Northern Beef Week
 
MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
Photo Library
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Land Subscriptions
 
The Land Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...